Re: Database block lifecycle

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database block lifecycle
Date: 2014-08-13 16:23:17
Message-ID: CAMkU=1x4rkCV1dNQ9DX1G9+kXo_0yKtBe--ydxcix-TcvYJpWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:07 AM, pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> btw. 512MB if we assume up to 600 connection is a reasonable value?
> >>
> >
> >>Reasonable value for what?
> >
> > For normal server load.
>

512MB is being questioned as a reasonable value for what? shared_buffers?
work_mem? maintenance_work_mem?

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robin 2014-08-13 18:19:41 Re: Database block lifecycle
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2014-08-13 11:58:40 Re: Postgres 9.3 tuning advice