| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2017-12-04 05:58:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ2o4ZSy13Hb9GAYj3_50r+hxfNjqc48vcKjaH7n59bBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
> pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
>
> It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
> review myself after that?
Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
status of the patch yourself.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2017-12-04 06:11:31 | Re: Do we actually need an ItemId array on nbtree pages containing fixed-width tuples? |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-12-04 05:38:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |