| From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2017-12-04 05:38:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAGTBQpZMzhZTONdhot2E5VJiOCzm94H=Dqhjk+JxsLuTpS4O0A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Rebased version of the patches attached
>
> The status of the patch is misleading:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/844/. This was marked as waiting
> on author but a new version has been published. Let's be careful.
>
> The last patches I am aware of, aka those from
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGTBQpZHTf2JtShC=ijc9wzEipo3XOKWQhx+8WiP7ZjPC3FBEg@mail.gmail.com,
> do not apply. I am moving the patch to the next commit fest with a
> waiting on author status, as this should be reviewed, but those need a
> rebase.
They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
review myself after that?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-12-04 05:58:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2017-12-04 04:20:43 | Re: Partition pruning for Star Schema |