| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2018-01-06 22:35:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20180106223559.GR2416@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
> > pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
> >
> > It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
> > review myself after that?
>
> Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
> status of the patch yourself.
We're now over a month since this status update- Claudio, for this to
have a chance during this commitfest to be included (which, personally,
I think would be great as it solves a pretty serious issue..), we really
need to have it be rebased and updated. Once that's done, as Michael
says, please change the patch status back to 'Needs Review'.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikita Glukhov | 2018-01-06 22:50:59 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-06 22:33:08 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently |