| From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2018-01-17 20:02:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAGTBQpa3mYBq+JaBLNtDdLrHgxCvmp_-kTmWcb3P-=T-SSyveg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
> > > pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
> > >
> > > It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
> > > review myself after that?
> >
> > Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
> > status of the patch yourself.
>
> We're now over a month since this status update- Claudio, for this to
> have a chance during this commitfest to be included (which, personally,
> I think would be great as it solves a pretty serious issue..), we really
> need to have it be rebased and updated. Once that's done, as Michael
> says, please change the patch status back to 'Needs Review'.
>
Sorry, had tons of other stuff that took priority.
I'll get to rebase this patch now.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-17 20:12:02 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-17 20:02:10 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |