Re: PostgreSQL Timeline

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Date: 2013-09-21 12:39:45
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ-BWtM+c5Jei+_1t=kh9xFt5OCUi9tA4NktUwm7AmShw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> That depends on your definition of "fork".
By playing it picky... Child project uses as a base state a given
commit from its parent.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-09-21 18:19:53 Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2013-09-20 21:25:14 Re: NC Triangle PUG