Re: PostgreSQL Timeline

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Date: 2013-09-21 18:19:53
Message-ID: 523DE349.1040509@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 09/21/2013 05:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> That depends on your definition of "fork".
> By playing it picky... Child project uses as a base state a given
> commit from its parent.

Problem is, we don't have that information, at least not for Vertica;
did they start out with new code and just use the PostgreSQL
parser/client, or did they start as a fork?

I happen to know that Paraccel *did* start out as a fork of Postgres.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-09-25 21:00:15 NC Triangle PUG mailing list
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-09-21 12:39:45 Re: PostgreSQL Timeline