Re: PostgreSQL Timeline

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Date: 2013-09-18 17:19:09
Message-ID: 5239E08D.7000000@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 09/18/2013 11:31 AM, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> Where are the references that Vertica is sort-of a PG fork and that
> Paraccel is a PG fork? Quick searches of the interweb finds claims that
> they are not. Not sure you need to bring doubt to the rest of the details
> in an excellent slide deck.

That depends on your definition of "fork". There are things which are
forks which are 90% community Postgres code, and things which are 30%
Postgres code. What percentage makes something a fork, and what
doesn't, and why?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MARK CALLAGHAN 2013-09-18 17:25:19 Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Previous Message MARK CALLAGHAN 2013-09-18 16:31:10 Re: PostgreSQL Timeline