Re: ensure, not insure

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ensure, not insure
Date: 2023-11-08 07:31:28
Message-ID: CAApHDvr0MCvnTCwqh6PNbc2LOppj8s5YnHzMLC97Y8ojKo73sw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 19:56, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> gettext_noop("The server will use the fsync() system call in several
> places to make "
> "sure that updates are physically written to disk. This insures "
> "that a database cluster will recover to a consistent state after "
> "an operating system or hardware crash.")
>
> ~
>
> I believe the word should have been "ensures"; not "insures".

I agree. It's surprisingly ancient, having arrived in b700a672f (June 2003).

> In passing I found/fixed a bunch of similar misuses in comments.

Those all look fine to me too.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2023-11-08 07:33:23 Doubled test for SET statements in pg_stat_statements tests
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-11-08 07:31:00 Re: Remove unnecessary 'always:' from CompilerWarnings task