From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On disable_cost |
Date: | 2024-10-10 12:43:32 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvr=gU3kSN0LXe8wBEq_8HrbZ4iGqHVPZrrsgB_g4Vnw-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 04:14, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think you have adequate consensus to proceed with this. I'd just ask
> that you don't disappear completely if it turns out that there are
> problems. I accept that my commit created this problem and I'm
> certainly willing to be involved too if we need to sort out more
> things.
Thanks. I've attached a polished-up version of the earlier patch.
I spent quite a bit of time testing it by manually adjusting
disabled_nodes while attached with my debugger. Doing it that way was
easier as it's often hard and maybe sometimes not possible to get the
disabled node you want in a plan.
I'll loop back to the documentation part and Laruenz's patch after
this part is committed.
If anyone wants to take a look at the attached, please do so.
Otherwise, I'm pretty happy with it and will likely push it on New
Zealand Friday (aka later today).
David
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-Adjust-EXPLAIN-s-output-for-disabled-nodes.patch | application/octet-stream | 38.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2024-10-10 12:59:59 | Re: replace strtok() |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-10-10 12:40:18 | Re: sunsetting md5 password support |