| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: On disable_cost |
| Date: | 2024-10-07 15:14:30 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZuaSX-FFvch0t5nvcBXk2c0O60gBRwx4w6zvBx-=oDPA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 1:37 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for explaining your point of view. I've not shifted my opinion
> any, so I guess we just disagree. I feel a strong enough dislike for
> the current EXPLAIN output to feel it's worth working harder to have a
> better output.
>
> I won't push my point any further unless someone else appears
> supporting Laurenz and I. Thank you for working on getting rid of the
> disabled_cost. I think what we have is now much better than before.
> The EXPLAIN output is the only part I dislike about this work.
>
> I'd encourage anyone else on the sidelines who has an opinion on how
> to display the disabled-ness of a plan node in EXPLAIN to speak up
> now, even if it's just a +1 to something someone has already written.
> It would be nice to see what more people think.
I think you have adequate consensus to proceed with this. I'd just ask
that you don't disappear completely if it turns out that there are
problems. I accept that my commit created this problem and I'm
certainly willing to be involved too if we need to sort out more
things.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-10-07 15:28:15 | Re: On disable_cost |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-10-07 15:11:28 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |