From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Small documentation improvement for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |
Date: | 2021-08-09 02:46:43 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JHe5PRvxVUv33KdZxt2CcBgZzA09S9mGdqRFSoEcfWmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 10:21 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 4:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 6:31 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > When reading the doc of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION I realized that 'refresh
> > > options' in the following paragraph is not tagged:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Additionally, refresh options as described under REFRESH PUBLICATION
> > > may be specified, except in the case of DROP PUBLICATION.
> > > ---
> > >
> > > When I read it for the first time, I got confused because we actually
> > > have the 'refresh' option and this description in the paragraph of the
> > > 'refresh' option. I think we can improve it by changing to
> > > '<replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable>'. Thoughts?
> > >
> >
> > I see that one can get confused but how about changing it to
> > "Additionally, refresh options as described under <literal>REFRESH
> > PUBLICATION</literal> (<replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable>) may
> > be specified,.."? I think keeping "refresh options" in the text would
> > be good because there could be multiple such options.
> >
>
> I feel like it would be better to reword it in some way that avoids
> using parentheses because they look like part of the syntax instead of
> just part of the sentence.
>
Fair enough, feel free to propose if you find something better or if
you think the current text in the docs is good.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-08-09 03:00:21 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2021-08-09 02:44:13 | Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM |