Re: Small documentation improvement for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small documentation improvement for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Date: 2021-08-09 04:01:40
Message-ID: CAHut+Pvd7U6q+sNUs=m06D8aYyGpbZJhE9eQ8LDsyJbJOBt6Gg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:46 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 10:21 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 4:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 6:31 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > When reading the doc of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION I realized that 'refresh
> > > > options' in the following paragraph is not tagged:
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Additionally, refresh options as described under REFRESH PUBLICATION
> > > > may be specified, except in the case of DROP PUBLICATION.
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > When I read it for the first time, I got confused because we actually
> > > > have the 'refresh' option and this description in the paragraph of the
> > > > 'refresh' option. I think we can improve it by changing to
> > > > '<replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable>'. Thoughts?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I see that one can get confused but how about changing it to
> > > "Additionally, refresh options as described under <literal>REFRESH
> > > PUBLICATION</literal> (<replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable>) may
> > > be specified,.."? I think keeping "refresh options" in the text would
> > > be good because there could be multiple such options.
> > >
> >
> > I feel like it would be better to reword it in some way that avoids
> > using parentheses because they look like part of the syntax instead of
> > just part of the sentence.
> >
>
> Fair enough, feel free to propose if you find something better or if
> you think the current text in the docs is good.
>

IMO just the same as your suggestion but without the parens would be good. e.g.

"Additionally, refresh options as described under <literal>REFRESH
PUBLICATION</literal> <replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable> may be
specified,.."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-08-09 04:18:05 Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-08-09 03:49:25 Re: Strange code in EXPLAIN for queryid