| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
| Date: | 2024-01-03 05:54:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J3vTDzPBmt+mcvmFE8mzm+a2wKkQW10KKnr6ybhtTu7g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:21 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 03:58:25PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Thanks, the changes look good.
> >
> > Pushed.
>
> Yeah! Thanks Amit and everybody involved here! Thanks also to Julien
> for raising the thread and the problem, to start with.
>
I think the next possible step here is to document how to upgrade the
logical replication nodes as previously discussed in this thread [1].
IIRC, there were a few issues with the steps mentioned but if we want
to document those we can start a separate thread for it as that
involves both publishers and subscribers.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-01-03 05:56:58 | Re: Assorted typo fixes |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-01-03 05:34:39 | Re: Assorted typo fixes |