From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
Date: | 2024-01-03 06:03:04 |
Message-ID: | ZZT4mFW2SMYVgDCL@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:24:50AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think the next possible step here is to document how to upgrade the
> logical replication nodes as previously discussed in this thread [1].
> IIRC, there were a few issues with the steps mentioned but if we want
> to document those we can start a separate thread for it as that
> involves both publishers and subscribers.
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2pe7SoOGtRkrTNsnZPnaaY%2B2iHC40HBYCSLYmyRg0wSw%40mail.gmail.com
Yep. A second thing is whether it makes sense to have more automated
test coverage when it comes to the interferences between subscribers
and publishers with more complex node structures.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-03 06:39:40 | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-01-03 05:56:58 | Re: Assorted typo fixes |