| From: | Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-06-05 19:01:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+bfosGLzfTdEEiZFWHcU7ftBjSHunYcNcd+UAMQ_g2-KcCfCg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:47 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> But I'd definitely like some
> independent testing for it, and I'm not sure if that's doable in time
> for the wrap.
>
I'd be happy to test on my database that was broken, for however much that
helps. It's a VM so I can easily revert back as needed. I'm just losing
track of all the patches, and what's committed and what I need to manually
apply :-). I was about to test what's on REL9_4_STABLE. Let me know if I
should do this.
Thanks so much everyone.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Casey Deccio | 2015-06-05 19:13:38 | Re: alter column type |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2015-06-05 18:55:25 | Re: alter column type |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-05 19:07:53 | Re: gcc -ansi versus SSE4.2 detection |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-05 18:57:10 | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |