| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
| Date: | 2015-06-05 18:57:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQLd45w92YbhvN5q0xQYbsU9RwJLaaGpN1095e6EBTTmQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> 4. Arguable RLS security bug, EvalPlanQual() paranoia - This seems
>> like another question of what the expectations around RLS actually
>> are.
>
> In the end that's minor from the end user's perspective.
I think that depends on what we ultimately decide to do about it,
which is something that I have yet to form an opinion on (although I
know we need to document the issue, at the very least). For example,
one idea that Stephen and I discussed privately was making security
barrier quals referencing other relations lock the referenced rows.
This was an informal throwing around of ideas, but it's possible that
something like that could end up happening.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Kehlet | 2015-06-05 19:01:47 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-05 18:53:31 | Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |