From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: alter column type |
Date: | 2015-06-05 18:55:25 |
Message-ID: | 5571F09D.8060405@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/5/2015 11:37 AM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> Why is PG even re-writing all rows when the data type is being changed
> from smaller (int) to larger (bigint) type, which automatically means
> existing data is safe. Like, changing from varchar(30) to varchar(50)
> should involve no rewrite of existing rows.
int to bigint requires storage change, as all bigints are 64 bit while
all ints are 32 bit. it would be a MESS to try and keep track of a
table that has some int and some bigint storage of a given field.
now, varchar 30 to 50, that I can't answer, are you sure that does a
rewrite? the storage is exactly the same for those.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Kehlet | 2015-06-05 19:01:47 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-05 18:53:31 | Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |