From: | Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other |
Date: | 2024-06-09 07:28:59 |
Message-ID: | CA+UBfakWVrd-oKovkCtJQfJ8bMFPpzLEQ+vD4UvdHc_8Zo0Z4Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
I am submitting two new patches. We can undefine the macro at two locations
1). As be-secure-openssl.c [1] was the actual
file where the conflict happened so I undefined the macro here before
the ssl includes. I changed the comment a little to make it understandable.
I am also attaching the error generated with ninja build.
OR
2). Right after the gssapi includes in libpq-be.h
Thanks
Imran Zaheer
Bitnine
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 7:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > On 2024-06-08 Sa 06:22, Imran Zaheer wrote:
> >> Now this can either be solved by just just undefine the macro defined
> >> by wincrypt.h as done here [3]
> >> Or we should rearrange our headers. Openssl header should be at the
> >> bottom (after the gssapi includes).
>
> > Let's be consistent and use the #undef from [3].
>
> +1. Depending on header order is not great, especially when you have
> to make it depend on an order that is directly contradictory to
> project conventions [0].
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_checklist#Policies
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ninja-build-pg-with-openssl-gssapi.txt | text/plain | 5.5 KB |
v01-0001-approach02-undefine-macro-after-gssapi-includes.patch | application/octet-stream | 700 bytes |
v01-0001-approach03-undefine-macro-before-ssl-includes.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | cca5507 | 2024-06-09 09:39:25 | Format the code in xact_decode |
Previous Message | Isaac Morland | 2024-06-09 02:13:27 | Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers? |