Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2024-06-11 09:19:17
Message-ID: CA+OCxowVv=PnmqL1qhGoK-_Jo3i549uzqK61z08nWOkE+D=Dzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 at 08:29, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am submitting two new patches. We can undefine the macro at two locations
>
> 1). As be-secure-openssl.c [1] was the actual
> file where the conflict happened so I undefined the macro here before
> the ssl includes. I changed the comment a little to make it understandable.
> I am also attaching the error generated with ninja build.
>
> OR
>
> 2). Right after the gssapi includes in libpq-be.h
>

Thank you for working on this. I can confirm the undef version compiles and
passes tests with 16.3.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-06-11 09:42:30 Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
Previous Message Masahiro Ikeda 2024-06-11 09:06:11 Doc: fix a description regarding WAL summarizer on glossary page