Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2024-06-08 22:21:24
Message-ID: 425201.1717885284@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2024-06-08 Sa 06:22, Imran Zaheer wrote:
>> Now this can either be solved by just just undefine the macro defined
>> by wincrypt.h as done here [3]
>> Or we should rearrange our headers. Openssl header should be at the
>> bottom (after the gssapi includes).

> Let's be consistent and use the #undef from [3].

+1. Depending on header order is not great, especially when you have
to make it depend on an order that is directly contradictory to
project conventions [0].

regards, tom lane

[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_checklist#Policies

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2024-06-08 22:49:38 Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
Previous Message Aaron Altman 2024-06-08 22:04:44 Re: Fix grammar oddities in comments