| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Date: | 2015-07-23 18:38:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobUs0unpdZF=nMhOGGX9EkxBH8ZzpAJi8FBsqrPyyJXOQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> This is more invasive than I'd like to backpatch, but I think it's the
> simplest approach that works, and doesn't disable any of the important
> optimizations we have.
Hmm, isn't HeapNeedsWAL() a lot more costly than RelationNeedsWAL()?
Should we be worried about that?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-23 18:39:04 | Re: Autonomous Transaction is back |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-07-23 18:33:38 | Re: Autonomous Transaction is back |