Re: Autonomous Transaction is back

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
Date: 2015-07-23 18:33:38
Message-ID: 55B13382.1000205@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Requesting for everyone's opinion regarding this based on which we can
> proceed to enhance/tune/re-write our design.

So, one of the things which came up during the discussion was advancing
XMIN, which is not important to the audit logging use case, but is very
important for the batch job use case. What have you concluded regarding
this item?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-07-23 18:38:13 Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-07-23 18:28:29 Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead