| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Autonomous Transaction is back |
| Date: | 2015-07-23 18:39:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZvfQU_OgdT7JmYfOyEVnQCjSHGmxVZ_jOk1pxA3pz-CA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Requesting for everyone's opinion regarding this based on which we can
>> proceed to enhance/tune/re-write our design.
>
> So, one of the things which came up during the discussion was advancing
> XMIN, which is not important to the audit logging use case, but is very
> important for the batch job use case. What have you concluded regarding
> this item?
Could you explain more specifically what you are talking about here?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-07-23 18:44:15 | Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-23 18:38:13 | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |