| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore |
| Date: | 2012-10-19 18:30:53 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoadsNdX5aPDCG2NOh5FBOFTTt5mW0opgDE7Bzx8AbEmow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> > Any comments on this?
>>
>> I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior
>> change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3.
>
> Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch
> we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior.
Oh, yeah. I missed that. But then shouldn't we start by identifying
which commit broke it before we decide on a fix?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-19 18:33:41 | Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-10-19 18:29:37 | Re: Very minor feature suggestion |