Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore
Date: 2012-10-18 15:19:31
Message-ID: 20121018151931.GE1982@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas escribió:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > Any comments on this?
>
> I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior
> change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3.

Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch
we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-10-18 15:20:27 Re: First draft of snapshot snapshot building design document
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-10-18 15:19:30 Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown