Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore
Date: 2012-10-18 17:08:53
Message-ID: 1350580133.7906.33.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 12:19 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > > Any comments on this?
> >
> > I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior
> > change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3.
>
> Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch
> we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior.
>

Yeah, Alvarro got it right. The behaviour changed in 9.2. This patch
needs to be applied on 9.2 and master, nothing else. If the patch is
good enough though...

--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-10-18 17:11:54 Re: Deprecating RULES
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2012-10-18 17:01:37 Re: Deprecating RULES