From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 |
Date: | 2012-10-19 18:33:41 |
Message-ID: | 20121019183341.GC4860@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner escribió:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Also, it doesn't appear that we ever got around to preparing
> > documentation updates, but I think we definitely need some if
> > we're going to start throwing errors for things that used to be
> > allowed. Since Kevin has the most field experience with this
> > problem, I'd like to nominate him to write some docs ...
>
> OK, will do. The "redo the DELETE and RETURN NULL" workaround is
> not at all obvious; we should definitely include an example of that.
Any chance this patch could be pushed soon?
The problem is that this patch conflicts rather heavily with my FOR KEY
SHARE patch. I think it makes sense to commit this one first.
To me, it would be good enough that the code changes go in now; the doc
patch can wait a little longer.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2012-10-19 18:39:23 | Re: pg_stat_lwlocks view - lwlocks statistics, round 2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-10-19 18:30:53 | Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore |