| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: More flexible LDAP auth search filters? |
| Date: | 2017-07-19 19:10:58 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoabwsPSS8VMaZpEi6t6=5850JtEgToE1kipXB7yZSYikA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> Refusing to improve LDAP for the users who have no choice seems like a very
>> unfriendly thing to do.
>
> I'm fine with improving LDAP in general, but, as I tried to point out,
> having a way to make it easier to integrate PG into an AD environment
> would be better. It's not my intent to stop this patch but rather to
> point out the issues with LDAP auth that far too frequently are not
> properly understood.
Then it's off-topic for this thread.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robins Tharakan | 2017-07-19 19:14:18 | Re: Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-07-19 19:08:13 | Re: Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump |