Re: relfilenode statistics

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
Date: 2024-11-04 19:51:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZtRxvAuMyO4bQjj5t47XWvQsowPAedkOkrCP61B7mQFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:27 AM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Then I think we should go with the "sometimes I don't know the relation OID
> so I want to use the relfilenumber instead, without changing the user experience"
> way.

So does the latest version of the patch implement that principal
uniformly throughout?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-11-04 20:00:03 Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-11-04 19:41:33 Re: Interrupts vs signals