| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: relfilenode statistics |
| Date: | 2024-11-05 06:05:58 |
| Message-ID: | Zym1xlMhuzPdekMt@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:51:10PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:27 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Then I think we should go with the "sometimes I don't know the relation OID
> > so I want to use the relfilenumber instead, without changing the user experience"
> > way.
>
> So does the latest version of the patch implement that principal
> uniformly throughout?
No, please don't look at v6-0001 and 0002 (as mentioned up-thread). The purpose
here is mainly to get an agreement on the design before moving forward.
Does it sound ok to you to move with the above principal? (I'm +1 on it).
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-11-05 06:19:07 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
| Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2024-11-05 06:00:10 | Re: doc: pgevent.dll location |