Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tcook(at)blackducksoftware(dot)com, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS
Date: 2017-12-21 15:44:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZdGT56-+9FqZ3T2nnwhcwmqePSwsdqt+vHDHE+TTUoLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Great subject line!
>
> fixed ...

Ack, sorry, I replied on the original thread, not realizing there was
a second one. Basically, I think the assertion is wrong-headed and
can be adjusted so it doesn't fail, and I attached a patch over there.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-12-21 16:06:19 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-12-21 15:42:33 Re: !<space>= should give error?