Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tcook(at)blackducksoftware(dot)com, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: force parallel mode vs CTAS
Date: 2017-12-21 16:13:57
Message-ID: 32588.1513872837@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Ack, sorry, I replied on the original thread, not realizing there was
> a second one. Basically, I think the assertion is wrong-headed and
> can be adjusted so it doesn't fail, and I attached a patch over there.

Yeah, I saw. Looks plausible to me, but I haven't studied the fine points
of the parallelism code enough to be confident in saying it's good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Kamholz 2017-12-21 16:44:04 Re: domain cast in parameterized vs. non-parameterized query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-21 16:11:44 Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.