Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml
Date: 2015-01-07 19:51:32
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYnDH+SQscCXqCoFr3XvrQN3RmObnmpmOSnkVZJJN5Qog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I thought my rewrite clarified this distinction pretty well. Maybe
>> I'm wrong? We're talking about the same paragraph.
>
> Sorry, I didn't express myself clearly. I think that you did get it
> right, but I would like to see that distinction also reflected in the
> actual sgml PARAMETER class tag. "expression" is way too generic here.

I'm happy to see us change that if it makes sense, but I'm not sure
what that actually does.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-01-07 20:01:20 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-01-07 19:45:51 Re: Patch: [BUGS] BUG #12320: json parsing with embedded double quotes