Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml
Date: 2015-01-06 21:07:30
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRyFPr=VcXBJYvEjmmNWMMjQZWXki1kWM-jHnHgcNOFqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I thought my rewrite clarified this distinction pretty well. Maybe
> I'm wrong? We're talking about the same paragraph.

Sorry, I didn't express myself clearly. I think that you did get it
right, but I would like to see that distinction also reflected in the
actual sgml PARAMETER class tag. "expression" is way too generic here.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-01-06 21:12:30 Re: Updating copyright notices to 2015 for PGDG
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-01-06 21:03:08 Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml