Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid
Date: 2018-02-27 19:44:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYg=v52VFa=XUWPKOGRaQkDtFXxOA8HhjVdQcs2OKsfeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> So the docs look correct to me on this side. What I find weird is the
> phrasing to define oldserxid. Instead of that, the current description:
> Waiting to I/O on an oldserxid buffer.
> I would suggest "waiting *for* I/O"
>
> A small patch is attached.

Agreed. Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-02-27 19:50:13 Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-27 19:41:47 Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.