On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:44:37PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> So the docs look correct to me on this side. What I find weird is the
>> phrasing to define oldserxid. Instead of that, the current description:
>> Waiting to I/O on an oldserxid buffer.
>> I would suggest "waiting *for* I/O"
>>
>> A small patch is attached.
>
> Agreed. Committed.
Thanks, Robert.
--
Michael