Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2016-06-01 13:00:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYZS04G76LeAq+9B594C9b46V56bD8LZrkRnmo-kjJwZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
>> and back-branches?
>
> Sounds sensible to me.

I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
extension they are writing, but I don't mind changing this in master.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-01 13:08:58 Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-06-01 12:34:06 Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names?