From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT |
Date: | 2016-06-01 13:18:00 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYd6CQBEYuHp6_Szp_sn4im7UaKLSVKaG+D_CRA6iy=6g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
> >> and back-branches?
> >
> > Sounds sensible to me.
>
>
+1
> I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
> PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
> extension they are writing
> [...]
>
>
-1
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2016-06-01 13:20:41 | array of domain types |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-01 13:08:58 | Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types |