Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PGBuildFarm <pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)
Date: 2015-05-18 11:28:03
Message-ID: CA+OCxowK_U0ga4Ha7F-WE76+=9tO2uaMphBhPJMsaw2DkFJpQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members

<sigh>. So now apparently the version of git on this box is too old,
as it doesn't support --porcelain. Attempting to build a new one.

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Argh - sent too soon...
>
> I'm still getting:
>
> Can't locate LWP.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/sun4-solaris-64int /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib
> /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/sun4-solaris-64int
> /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/perl5/site_perl
> /usr/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/sun4-solaris-64int
> /usr/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/perl5/vendor_perl .) at
> PGBuild/WebTxn.pm line 29.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at PGBuild/WebTxn.pm line 35.
> Compilation failed in require at ./run_build.pl line 77.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./run_build.pl line 77.
>
> Upon looking further, it seems that my previous versions of
> run_web_txn.pl all start with:
>
> #!/opt/csw/bin/perl
>
> Which makes sense, as that seems to be the default Perl on here.
> Clearly I must have changed that script years ago to ensure this
> worked (that Perl installation does have LWP installed).
>
> Anyway, I've updated the script again - firing off a build now.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> Hmm, well apparently installing LWP using cpan as root didn't help
>> anyway - I'm still getting:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's very odd.
>>>
>>> LWP has been a requirement from Day 1 of the buildfarm. It's what's used to
>>> load the results to the server. There have been special considerations for
>>> older Msys systems, so that you run the main script with Msys perl, which
>>> used not to have LWP, and the web script with ActivePerl, which does, but
>>> that shouldn't apply on Solaris.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2015 04:57 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Casteroides and protosciurus appear to be stuck as the most recent
>>>> update to the BF code now seems to want the LWP perl module, which
>>>> wasn't installed. I've added that - will see if they recover.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The following buildfarm members haven't reported on HEAD in more than a
>>>>> week:
>>>>>
>>>>> tick
>>>>> leech
>>>>> markhor
>>>>> stilt
>>>>> protosciurus
>>>>> castoroides
>>>>>
>>>>> Several of these are using CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, and are probably stuck
>>>>> because of the plpython bug Peter E. introduced awhile back. That is
>>>>> believed to be fixed now, but you'll probably have to manually kill the
>>>>> current run to get it unstuck.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards, tom lane
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pgbuildfarm-members mailing list
>>>>> Pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org
>>>>> http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgbuildfarm-members
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-05-18 11:51:45 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)
Previous Message Dave Page 2015-05-18 10:54:14 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)