Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PGBuildFarm <pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)
Date: 2015-05-18 10:54:14
Message-ID: CA+OCxoy2y8JsYcNsJpHvD-VB3atz_upHff=-HYJXVdE684nkjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members

Argh - sent too soon...

I'm still getting:

Can't locate LWP.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/sun4-solaris-64int /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib
/usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/sun4-solaris-64int
/usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/perl5/site_perl
/usr/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/sun4-solaris-64int
/usr/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/perl5/vendor_perl .) at
PGBuild/WebTxn.pm line 29.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at PGBuild/WebTxn.pm line 35.
Compilation failed in require at ./run_build.pl line 77.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./run_build.pl line 77.

Upon looking further, it seems that my previous versions of
run_web_txn.pl all start with:

#!/opt/csw/bin/perl

Which makes sense, as that seems to be the default Perl on here.
Clearly I must have changed that script years ago to ensure this
worked (that Perl installation does have LWP installed).

Anyway, I've updated the script again - firing off a build now.

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Hmm, well apparently installing LWP using cpan as root didn't help
> anyway - I'm still getting:
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> That's very odd.
>>
>> LWP has been a requirement from Day 1 of the buildfarm. It's what's used to
>> load the results to the server. There have been special considerations for
>> older Msys systems, so that you run the main script with Msys perl, which
>> used not to have LWP, and the web script with ActivePerl, which does, but
>> that shouldn't apply on Solaris.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/18/2015 04:57 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>> Casteroides and protosciurus appear to be stuck as the most recent
>>> update to the BF code now seems to want the LWP perl module, which
>>> wasn't installed. I've added that - will see if they recover.
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The following buildfarm members haven't reported on HEAD in more than a
>>>> week:
>>>>
>>>> tick
>>>> leech
>>>> markhor
>>>> stilt
>>>> protosciurus
>>>> castoroides
>>>>
>>>> Several of these are using CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, and are probably stuck
>>>> because of the plpython bug Peter E. introduced awhile back. That is
>>>> believed to be fixed now, but you'll probably have to manually kill the
>>>> current run to get it unstuck.
>>>>
>>>> regards, tom lane
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pgbuildfarm-members mailing list
>>>> Pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org
>>>> http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgbuildfarm-members
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2015-05-18 11:28:03 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)
Previous Message Dave Page 2015-05-18 10:40:58 Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)