Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code
Date: 2018-03-02 16:17:46
Message-ID: CA+HiwqE0s3jQf7raKu=A+57jusweu1E+RGe72BE8TXGWcrEEpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David.

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:53 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 2/16/18 3:36 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>
>> Attached updated version.
>
> This patch no longer applies and the conflicts do not appear to be trivial.
>
> I'm a bit confused about your comment in [1]:
>
>> I gave up on rebasing this patch yesterday as I couldn't finish it in
>> 5 minutes, but maybe I will try later this month. Gotta focus on
>> thefaster pruning stuff for now...
>
> How much later are we talking about?

Sorry about the confusing comment. It could be sometime later half of
the next week.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-03-02 16:24:42 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Nikolay Shaplov 2018-03-02 16:12:58 Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters