From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code |
Date: | 2018-03-21 14:14:58 |
Message-ID: | b2b59230-d5d1-496a-c004-512c59750db7@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit,
On 3/2/18 11:17 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:53 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>> On 2/16/18 3:36 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>>
>>> Attached updated version.
>>
>> This patch no longer applies and the conflicts do not appear to be trivial.
>>
>> I'm a bit confused about your comment in [1]:
>>
>>> I gave up on rebasing this patch yesterday as I couldn't finish it in
>>> 5 minutes, but maybe I will try later this month. Gotta focus on
>>> thefaster pruning stuff for now...
>>
>> How much later are we talking about?
>
> Sorry about the confusing comment. It could be sometime later half of
> the next week.
We are now three weeks into the CF with no new patch.
Are you planning to update this patch? If not, I think it should be
marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
has been updated.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-21 14:16:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-21 14:00:41 | Re: constraint exclusion and nulls in IN (..) clause |