Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code
Date: 2018-03-21 14:14:58
Message-ID: b2b59230-d5d1-496a-c004-512c59750db7@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit,

On 3/2/18 11:17 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:53 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>> On 2/16/18 3:36 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>>
>>> Attached updated version.
>>
>> This patch no longer applies and the conflicts do not appear to be trivial.
>>
>> I'm a bit confused about your comment in [1]:
>>
>>> I gave up on rebasing this patch yesterday as I couldn't finish it in
>>> 5 minutes, but maybe I will try later this month. Gotta focus on
>>> thefaster pruning stuff for now...
>>
>> How much later are we talking about?
>
> Sorry about the confusing comment. It could be sometime later half of
> the next week.

We are now three weeks into the CF with no new patch.

Are you planning to update this patch? If not, I think it should be
marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
has been updated.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-03-21 14:16:08 Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-03-21 14:00:41 Re: constraint exclusion and nulls in IN (..) clause