Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code
Date: 2018-03-02 14:53:24
Message-ID: 738d44dd-ce65-cfa8-ac56-bdb1c229c3f9@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit,

On 2/16/18 3:36 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Attached updated version.

This patch no longer applies and the conflicts do not appear to be trivial.

I'm a bit confused about your comment in [1]:

> I gave up on rebasing this patch yesterday as I couldn't finish it in
> 5 minutes, but maybe I will try later this month. Gotta focus on
> thefaster pruning stuff for now...

How much later are we talking about?

Marked Waiting on Author.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/33098109-9ef1-9594-e7d5-0977a50f8cfa%40lab.ntt.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-02 14:53:41 Re: perltidy version
Previous Message Hongyuan Ma 2018-03-02 14:39:56 Re:Re: [GSOC 18] Performance Farm Project