From: | Gregory Gerard <ggerard(at)mac(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Date: | 2011-10-02 04:00:12 |
Message-ID: | B75582D7-A3C2-497B-86EB-430E49814C4F@mac.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
How does this same benchmark compare on similar (or same) hardware but with magnetic media?
On Oct 1, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Andy wrote:
> Do you have an Intel 320? I'd love to see tests comparing 710 to 320 and see if it's worth the price premium.
>
> From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
> To: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 10:39 PM
> Subject: [PERFORM] Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
>
>
> I have a 710 (Lyndonville) SSD in a test server. Ultimately we'll run
> capacity tests using our application (which in turn uses PG), but it'll
> take a while to get those set up. In the meantime, I'd be happy to
> entertain running whatever tests folks here would like to suggest,
> spare time-permitting.
>
> I've already tried bonnie++, sysbench and a simple WAL emulation
> test program I wrote more than 10 years ago. The drive tests at
> around 160Mbyte/s on bulk data and 4k tps for commit rate writing
> small blocks.
>
>
>
> -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2011-10-02 08:33:45 | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Previous Message | Andy | 2011-10-02 03:22:42 | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |