Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test

From: Gregory Gerard <ggerard(at)mac(dot)com>
To: Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
Date: 2011-10-02 04:00:12
Message-ID: B75582D7-A3C2-497B-86EB-430E49814C4F@mac.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

How does this same benchmark compare on similar (or same) hardware but with magnetic media?

On Oct 1, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Andy wrote:

> Do you have an Intel 320? I'd love to see tests comparing 710 to 320 and see if it's worth the price premium.
>
> From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
> To: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 10:39 PM
> Subject: [PERFORM] Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
>
>
> I have a 710 (Lyndonville) SSD in a test server. Ultimately we'll run
> capacity tests using our application (which in turn uses PG), but it'll
> take a while to get those set up. In the meantime, I'd be happy to
> entertain running whatever tests folks here would like to suggest,
> spare time-permitting.
>
> I've already tried bonnie++, sysbench and a simple WAL emulation
> test program I wrote more than 10 years ago. The drive tests at
> around 160Mbyte/s on bulk data and 4k tps for commit rate writing
> small blocks.
>
>
>
> -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arjen van der Meijden 2011-10-02 08:33:45 Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
Previous Message Andy 2011-10-02 03:22:42 Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test