From: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Date: | 2011-10-02 13:49:26 |
Message-ID: | 4E886BE6.8060907@boreham.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 10/1/2011 10:00 PM, Gregory Gerard wrote:
> How does this same benchmark compare on similar (or same) hardware but
> with magnetic media?
I don't have that data at present :(
So far I've been comparing performance with our current production
machines, which are older.
Those machines use 'raptors with no BBU/WBC, so their tps performance is
very low (100 per second or so).
Since our application tends to be limited by the transaction commit
rate, the SSD-based machine
is clearly going to be at least an order of magnitude faster. But I
don't know its relative performance
vs. the traditional BBU/WBC controller + string of drives approach (we
rejected that as an option already
for power consumption and space reasons).
I could install a raptor drive in the new server and test that, but it
wouldn't have a BBU/WBC controller.
I guess I could enable the drive's write cache which might produce
comparable results to a controller's WBC.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Boreham | 2011-10-02 14:02:26 | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Previous Message | Eduardo Nazor | 2011-10-02 09:59:28 |