From: | Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Date: | 2011-10-02 03:22:42 |
Message-ID: | 1317525762.87269.YahooMailNeo@web111315.mail.gq1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Do you have an Intel 320? I'd love to see tests comparing 710 to 320 and see if it's worth the price premium.
________________________________
From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 10:39 PM
Subject: [PERFORM] Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
I have a 710 (Lyndonville) SSD in a test server. Ultimately we'll run
capacity tests using our application (which in turn uses PG), but it'll
take a while to get those set up. In the meantime, I'd be happy to
entertain running whatever tests folks here would like to suggest,
spare time-permitting.
I've already tried bonnie++, sysbench and a simple WAL emulation
test program I wrote more than 10 years ago. The drive tests at
around 160Mbyte/s on bulk data and 4k tps for commit rate writing
small blocks.
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Gerard | 2011-10-02 04:00:12 | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Previous Message | David Boreham | 2011-10-02 02:39:27 | Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |