From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: On Scalability |
Date: | 2010-10-07 17:08:24 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinZufxJMbQYC0+=XKU_VeVzE_EmWaWsKOkwihNv@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
2010/10/7 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
> * Vincenzo Romano (vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it) wrote:
>> So, what'd be the right approach in your vision?
>
> Have you read http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning and the
> various places it links to..?
>
>> I mean, if you think about partitioning a-la Oracle, then you'll have to
>> parse those expressions anyway.
>
> Oracle's approach is discussed there.
I didn't meant the implementation, but the goals achieved.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkyt6ikACgkQrzgMPqB3kih0HwCcD8rQQhD6oXao8ZnG/bMAvx2d
> 4HkAnjrzox4XemzVyFkhKRXb3ZjS2nba
> =6WlP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
Vincenzo Romano at NotOrAnd Information Technologies
Software Hardware Networking Training Support Security
--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | A.M. | 2010-10-07 17:19:33 | Re: O_DSYNC broken on MacOS X? |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-10-07 16:41:55 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-10-07 17:16:36 | Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 15:41:29 | Re: On Scalability |