| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On Scalability |
| Date: | 2010-10-07 15:41:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20101007154129.GX26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
* Vincenzo Romano (vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it) wrote:
> So, what'd be the right approach in your vision?
Have you read http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning and the
various places it links to..?
> I mean, if you think about partitioning a-la Oracle, then you'll have to
> parse those expressions anyway.
Oracle's approach is discussed there.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-10-07 15:43:03 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-10-07 15:35:29 | Re: On Scalability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2010-10-07 17:08:24 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-10-07 15:35:29 | Re: On Scalability |