From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature Matrix |
Date: | 2010-08-11 08:15:55 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikXDhCHAu+Q=PznxM5RPhjNBYUf49uc12tF8-L-@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 11 August 2010 01:29, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> The matrix is also beginning to look a bit busy too. Once support for
>> 7.4 and 8.0 stops, do you think we should also drop those columns? If
>> so, we could also drop rows where a feature exists from 8.1 or before
>> which would trim the list.
>>
>
> I think it would be nice to save the existing content to somewhere before
> doing that trimming through. Having a chart showing the major feature
> evolution of the database that goes back as far as possible is really useful
> sometimes. Perhaps forking the current chart into a "7.4 through 9.0"
> history, and then trimming everything from before 8.1 before adding a 9.1
> column?
>
+1
Sounds good to me. :)
--
Thom Brown
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-08-11 17:14:04 | Re: Feature Matrix |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-11 04:11:10 | Re: Feature Matrix |